Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Med J Aust ; 217(2): C1-C3, 2022 07 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283151
2.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(9): 1603-1607, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1936706

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The pandemic has uncovered a broad lack of understanding of the role of the Medical Director in Canadian Long-Term Care (LTC) Homes. Our objectives were to identify the current demographics and practices of LTC Medical Directors, discover how the pandemic affected their practice habits, and inform the content of the Ontario Long-Term Care Clinicians Medical Director Course, to ensure that Medical Directors have the requisite knowledge of the responsibilities of their role. DESIGN: Email survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Medical directors in Ontario long-term care homes. METHODS: Responses to open-ended, close-ended, multiple-choice, and free-text questions. RESULTS: A total of 156 medical directors (approximately 24%) completed the survey. Ninety-four percent were family physicians. Approximately 40% of participants had been a medical director for fewer than 5 years, whereas more than 11% have been in the role for greater than 30 years. More than 60% spend fewer than 2 hours per week in their administrative role, with fewer than 23% completing formal evaluations of the attending clinicians. Greater than 75% are either satisfied or extremely satisfied in their medical director role, citing excellent engagement and collaboration with team members. Feelings of dissatisfaction were associated with pandemic stress, increased hours and responsibility, inadequate remuneration, lack of ability to make decisions and lack of acknowledgement that physicians add value to the interdisciplinary team. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: It is clear that medical directors are in a unique position to impact the care of residents within LTC. It is imperative to engage medical directors as integral members of the LTC health care team. This can be achieved by acknowledging their medical expertise for improving outcomes, providing them with the authority for decision making, compensating them appropriately, and clearly defining the role. By making these changes, we can ensure that there is a higher likelihood to sustain effective medical leadership in LTC.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physician Executives , Humans , Long-Term Care , Ontario/epidemiology , Physicians, Family
3.
BMJ ; 377: o1232, 2022 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1854311
4.
Front Public Health ; 10: 830266, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1834647

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged medical professionals worldwide with an unprecedented need to provide care under conditions of complexity, uncertainty, and danger. These conditions, coupled with the unrelenting stress of overwhelming workloads, exhaustion, and decision-making fatigue, have forced clinicians to generate coping mechanisms. This qualitative study explored the use of metaphors as a coping mechanism by clinical directors of COVID-19 wards in Israeli public general hospitals while they were exposed to death and trauma throughout the pandemic's first wave in Israel (March to June 2020). The study employs discourse methodology and metaphor mapping analysis to capture the personal, organizational, and social dimensions of effective and ineffective processes of coping with an extreme health crisis. Analysis revealed that the metaphors that clinical directors used reflect a dual process of mediating and generating the social construction of meaning and facilitating effective and ineffective coping. Effective coping was facilitated by war metaphors that created a sense of mission and meaningfulness at both the organizational and the individual levels. War metaphors that generated a sense of isolation and sacrifice intensified helplessness and fear, which undermined coping. We propose actionable recommendations to enhance effective coping for individuals and organizations in this ongoing pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physician Executives , Adaptation, Psychological , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Metaphor , Pandemics
5.
Front Public Health ; 10: 801297, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1834640

ABSTRACT

Purpose: There are a few qualitative studies on the psychological resilience of COVID-19 medical directors upon outbreaks of pandemics. Psychological resilience is essential to providing quality care through the pandemic. Materials and Methods: We conducted narrative interviews with 14 out of 21 medical directors of COVID-19 divisions in Israeli public hospitals upon the outbreak of the pandemic and through its first wave. We adopted the Salutogenic paradigm to identify personal and organizational resources that both deterred and promoted resilience of front-line medical directors. Thematic analysis was performed based on the Sense of coherence construct, an anchor of Salutogenics. Results: Low comprehensibility was compensated by ethical boundaries and managerial experience. A few organizational and personal resources promoted manageability. The hospital management both deterred and promoted resilience. In contrast to Salutogenics theory, meaningfulness was driven by the occupational calling rather than by comprehensibility and manageability. Gaps in personal resources inhibited resilience. Conclusions: Our study adds to the scant qualitative research performed upon the outbreak of the pandemic and extends the Salutogenic paradigm suggesting that the three axes of sense of coherence are multi-layered, intertwined, and evolving. We introduce the dynamic spheres model that we adopted from Physics to illustrate the findings. We propose interventions to build resilience in front-line medical directors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physician Executives , Resilience, Psychological , Sense of Coherence , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Israel
9.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(24): 7829-7832, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1604716

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: As a result of COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 US residency MATCH was devoid of the traditional in-person interviews. Herein, we assess the impact of Virtual Interviews (VIs) on resident selection, from the perspectives of Orthopedic Surgery (OS) Program Directors (PDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 14-item survey was sent to PDs of ACGME-accredited OS residencies. Questions were designed to assess the pros, cons, and robustness of VIs compared to their antecedent in-person format. RESULTS: Forty-seven PDs responded to our survey. VIs antagonized PDs' ability to assess applicants' fit to program (76.6%), commitment to specialty (64%), and interpersonal skills (68.1%). This led to heavier dependence upon applicants' portfolios (64%). Almost all respondents (97.9%) found VIs to be more cost-efficient, saving a median of $3000 in interview-related expenses. Overall, only 8.5% of PDs were willing to conduct exclusive VIs in future cycles, compared to the majority in favor of dual formats (51.5%) or exclusive in-person interviews (40.4%). CONCLUSIONS: VIs have been an overall success, making most PDs opt for dual interview formats in future cycles. How this technology is further implemented in the future remains to be seen.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Orthopedic Procedures/education , Physician Executives/statistics & numerical data , Telecommunications/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Internship and Residency/trends , Orthopedic Procedures/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personnel Selection/methods , Personnel Selection/standards , Personnel Selection/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Selection/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Telecommunications/standards , Telecommunications/trends
10.
Chest ; 159(3): 902-903, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1338367
11.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251523, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1219018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This paper aimed to describe the airway practices of intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand specific to patients presenting with COVID-19 and to inform whether consistent clinical practice was achieved. Specific clinical airway guidelines were endorsed in March 2020 by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) and College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prospective, structured questionnaire for all ICU directors in Australia and New Zealand was completed by 69 ICU directors after email invitation from ANZICS. The online questionnaire was accessible for three weeks during September 2020 and analysed by cloud-based software. Basic ICU demographics (private or public, metropolitan or rural) and location, purchasing, airway management practices, guideline uptake, checklist and cognitive aid use and staff training relevant to airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic were the main outcome measures. The 69 ICU directors reported significant simulation-based inter-professional airway training of staff (97%), and use of video laryngoscopy (94%), intubation checklists (94%), cognitive aids (83%) and PPE "spotters" (89%) during the airway management of patients with COVID-19. Tracheal intubation was almost always performed by a Specialist (97% of ICUs), who was more likely to be an intensivist than an anaesthetist (61% vs 36%). There was a more frequent adoption of specific airway guidelines for the management of COVID-19 patients in public ICUs (94% vs 71%) and reliance on specialist intensivists to perform intubations in private ICUs (92% vs 53%). CONCLUSION: There was a high uptake of a standardised approach to airway management in COVID-19 patients in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand, likely due to endorsement of national guidelines.


Subject(s)
Airway Management , COVID-19/epidemiology , Airway Management/statistics & numerical data , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/virology , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Intensive Care Units , New Zealand/epidemiology , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Physician Executives/psychology , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
J Insur Med ; 49(1): 11-18, 2021 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1158481

ABSTRACT

The sudden emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 presented a unique challenge for medical directors of life insurance companies. Company leadership required quick answers about many issues, but two in particular: 1) the magnitude of the pandemic's impact on the insured lives portfolio and 2) the underwriting of new applicants during a pandemic. This article will describe the experiences of a global team of reinsurance medical directors during a pandemic. It may also serve to provide guidance for medical directors facing a similar challenge in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Insurance, Life/economics , Physician Executives/organization & administration , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Soins Gerontol ; 25(146): 18-20, 2020.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-951550

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic affected severely and rapidly the Oise department. The care of patients infected with this virus required a review of the organization of the units. The healthcare executive has been a key player in the management of this health crisis. Example in a follow-up care and rehabilitation service.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Physician Executives , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Soins Gerontol ; 25(146): 27-29, 2020.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-947457

ABSTRACT

Sunday, day of rest in a pavilion of Seine-Saint-Denis in this so particular period of confinement because of the coronavirus disease 2019. Time seems to stand still. A healthcare executive shares his experiences at the "Les 4 Saisons" accommodation facility for dependent elderly, located in Bagnolet.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Homes for the Aged , Nursing Homes , Aged , Humans , Pandemics , Physician Executives , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Acad Pediatr ; 21(2): 201-204, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-938660

ABSTRACT

For academic pediatricians, social media has become an important avenue for professional development through continuing education, professional networking, and academic collaboration. Pediatric residency program directors have recognized additional benefits of social media engagement via program promotion and resident recruitment. The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and subsequent move to virtual interviews for the 2020-2021 residency interview season have created a new urgency for pediatric program directors to establish an active social media presence, primarily as a means to engage applicants and provide them with information in lieu of cancelled away rotations and in-person interviews. Twitter is a free microblogging and social networking platform that allows real-time engagement among academic pediatricians. Here, we make the case that all pediatric program directors should have an active presence on Twitter.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Internship and Residency , Pediatrics , Physician Executives , Social Media , Social Networking , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Humans
18.
CMAJ Open ; 8(3): E560-E567, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-745293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, Canada's provincial chief medical officers of health (CMOHs) have provided regular updates on the pandemic response. We sought to examine whether their messaging varied over time and whether it varied across jurisdictions. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study of news releases from Canadian provincial government websites during the initial phases of the COVID-19 outbreak between Jan. 21 and Mar. 31, 2020. We performed content analysis using a predefined data extraction framework to derive themes. RESULTS: We identified 290 news releases. Four broad thematic categories emerged: describing the government's preparedness and capacity building, issuing recommendations and mandates, expressing reassurance and encouraging the public, and promoting public responsibility. Most of the news releases were prescriptive, conveying recommendations and mandates to slow transmission. Cross-jurisdictional variations in messaging reflected local realities, such as evidence of community transmission. Messaging also reflected changing information about the pandemic over time, shifting from a tone of reassurance early on, to a sudden emphasis on social distancing measures, to a concern with public responsibility to slow transmission. INTERPRETATION: Messaging across jurisdictions was generally consistent, and variations in the tone and timing of CMOH messaging aligned with different and changing realities across contexts. These findings indicate that when evaluating CMOHs' statements, it is critical to consider the context of the information they possess, the epidemiologic circumstances in their jurisdiction and the way the province has structured the CMOH role.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Information Dissemination/methods , Physician Executives/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Canada/epidemiology , Communication , Humans , Physician Executives/ethics , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
19.
Am J Manag Care ; 26(6): 238-239, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-743217

ABSTRACT

To mark the 25th anniversary of the journal, each issue in 2020 will include an interview with a healthcare thought leader. For the June issue, we turned to Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP, president emeritus and senior fellow at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and former administrator of CMS.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Health Care Reform , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Quality Improvement , Administrative Personnel , COVID-19 , Humans , Physician Executives , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL